[The Proposition] ‘Equal opportunities cause inequality’

Opinion
PhD candidates explain the most thought-provoking proposition in their thesis. This time it’s Lotte Yanore.

[The Proposition] ‘Experts are often not the best communicators for topics within their expertise’

Opinion
PhD candidates explain their most thought-provoking proposition. This time Annika Mangold-Döring.

The Proposition: ‘Scientists underestimate the impact of visual storystelling to amplify the societal impact of their scientific results.’

Opinion
PhD candidates explain their most thought-provoking proposition. This time Nathan Meijer.

[The Proposition] ‘Efficiency is overrated in our society.’

Opinion
PhD candidates explain their most thought-provoking proposition. This time Eva Huet.

[The Proposition] ‘The behaviour of an individual serves as a model for the rest of the society’

Opinion
PhD candidates explain their most thought-provoking proposition. This time Barbara Vital.

[The Proposition] ‘Predatory journals burn public money’

Opinion
PhD candidates explain their most thought-provoking proposition. This time Annika Tensi.

[The Proposition] ‘Social media are anti-social platforms’

Opinion
PhD candidates explain their most thought-provoking proposition. This time Francesco Pancaldi.

[The Proposition] ‘AI will increasingly impact our lives, but whether it will lead to an improved quality of life is uncertain’

Opinion
PhD candidates explain their most thought-provoking proposition. This time Martina Lazzarin.

[The Proposition] ‘Adding extra flavour to peanut butter requires very special grounds’

Science
PhD candidates explain their most thought-provoking proposition. This time Janneke Elzinga.

[The Proposition] ‘Too much wisdom is bad for creativity’

Science
PhD candidates explain their most thought-provoking proposition. This time Tom Theeuwen.