Photo: Shutterstock An article about this in PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences) has attracted a lot of attention internationally. The study documents the shift in the zones on the Earth where humans feel most comfortable and perform best. Thanks to global warming, the human species’ ‘niche’ is moving. And that could lead to mass migration.
Bell curve
Scheffer hit upon the idea of mapping the human ‘comfort zone’ during a conference in the Mexican city of Merida, where it was hot and humid. ‘Is that good for a human being?’ Scheffer asked himself. The thought led to a study of the limits for human habitation and the link between the average annual temperature and human habitation. Plotting that link gives a classic bell curve with an optimum of around 13 degrees Celsius.
That optimal temperature and the range around it (-11 to +15 degrees Celsius) does not appear to have changed for the past 6000 years. This led to the next question, of what impact global warming will have on that human habitat. Scheffer and his international team (which includes an archaeologist, a social geographer and a climate scientist) are looking 50 years ahead.
Without a big reduction in greenhouse gases, 19 per cent of the Earth’s surface will have Sahara-like annual average temperatures of over 29 degrees Celsius. And one third of the world population will be living there: the north of South America, Australia, Africa, India and South-East Asia. Scheffer: ‘India is already at the limit of what is viable. It mustn’t get any hotter there, but that is going to happen.’
We have calculated a kind of social sensitivity to heating
Marten Scheffer, professor of Aquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management
But even the less extreme climate scenarios produce worrying figures. Even if the rise in temperature can be limited through various measures, we shall still have 1.5 billion people living in zones that are too hot. An alarming message, but Scheffer prefers to see it positively. ‘You can also say that for every degree less heating, one billion fewer people get into difficulties.’
That core message is the strength of this study, says Scheffer. ‘The impact of climate change is often expressed in dollars. This makes more of an impression on people, and it hasn’t been done before. We have calculated a kind a social sensitivity to heating.’ As far as Scheffer is concerned, it is a given that global heating will lead to mass migration. ‘I can’t imagine how this could not lead to the migration of at least 100 million people.’
Signals
Scheffer dismisses the criticism that working with the worst case scenario is pessimistic. ‘A lot of measures are being taken, but for the time being, CO2 emissions are still rising. What is more, there are more and more signs that the Earth is much more sensitive to those emissions than we thought. We don’t yet know all the mechanisms that play a role.’
There is also the fact that the hottest zones are the areas where the poorest people live. ‘You can live there fine if you have air-conditioning and the means to import food. But the people who live there don’t have those means. So not worrying about the impact of climate change in regions like that is wishful thinking.
Here you can view the video where Scheffer explains his research.